The Junction REFDOC table should be used in conjunction with the Junction feature class https://data.austintexas.gov/dataset/Junction/bebd-359f with a join on the DRAINAGE_ID.

The Discharge Pump REFDOC table should be used in conjunction with the Discharge Pump feature class https://data.austintexas.gov/dataset/Discharge-Pump/b5z6-42rk with a join on the DRAINAGE_ID.

The Misc Points REFDOC table should be used in conjunction with the Misc Points feature class https://data.austintexas.gov/dataset/MiscPoint/4cyn-ayp7 with a join on the DRAINAGE_ID.

The Bridge Inlet REFDOC table should be used in conjunction with the Bridge Inlet feature class https://data.austintexas.gov/dataset/Bridge-Inlet/t598-em66
with a join on the DRAINAGE_ID.

This layer represents the buffered geography around the known landfills in and around the City of Austin, Texas. Due to the uncertainty of the boundaries of the landfills; the buffers are used to regulate development in close proximity to the landfills. Areas of known landfill boundaries utilize the 200' buffer. Areas where general knowledge of the landfill location is known utilize a 1500' buffer.

The Bar Ditch REFDOC table should be used in conjunction with the Bar Ditch feature class https://data.austintexas.gov/dataset/Bar-Ditch/eqiz-dc5p with a join on the DRAINAGE_ID.

These are the geographic boundaries for reaches evaluated as part of the Environmental Integrity Index and Austin Lakes Index . Scores can be found in tabular form: https://data.austintexas.gov/Environment/Watershed-Reach-Index-and-Problem-Scores/vk3r-6prc

This layer represents the locations for low water crossing gates maintained by the City

This dataset represents wetland CEFs identified during the development review process since 1995. Prior to 1995, data is either unavailable or lost.Wetland CEFs were digitized from construction plans, environmental assessments, and City of Austin staff field observations. Features were digitized into a versioned SDE database in ArcMap. Wetland delineation may be determined through a process of negotiation with land development interests and generally reflect the most protective arrangement that could be obtained. Additionally, “fringe wetlands” were drawn using a standard 2’ width on either side of a waterway.